2026-11-11 15:10 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@tyler@programming.dev 2026-11-11 15:54
Agreed. The “came in” is popping up more and more. I’m guessing it’s watermarking since it doesn’t make any sense at all usually.
-
@entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 2026-11-11 16:43
To me, all of the quotes in question just read as especially formal journalistic English. Especially that last one ‘Synaptics said it would grant no patent license’ is just a more formal phrasing that is pretty standard for e.g. newspaper writing, especially if you look at how the sentence structure puts the date first, then the quoted party, then the paraphrase of what they said. Very normal newspaper style. I haven’t read the article yet but these quotes you pulled out in particular don’t read as AI to me, as a software engineer who talks to Claude all day for work. Will update once I’ve read the article.
-
@Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2026-11-11 17:29
The idiom “Came in” has been in common use since the last 1800’s. You can find it on Google’s N-Gram search. Heck it appears in Shakespeare! idioms.thefreedictionary.com/came+in
-
@DarkMetatron@feddit.org 2026-11-12 09:27
I would have written it mostly the same, and I am not an AI but a german guy who learned English as secondary language. I got a huge part of my vocabulary by reading tons of nonfictional text (mostly technical documentation and legal texts), and this has shaped my speaking and writing to be very formal and technical. So it could just be written by someone who is not a native speaker and therefore has an english that sounds/reads odd.