← Feed

Posts

• View post

  The formatting, style, cadence and tone feel very AI to me. The authors seem like real people with real history and I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, the topic and status summarization is genuinely interesting whether it's AI or not, but it's hard not to feel a bit sus reading it.

• View post

  Dating apps are what broke dating. If you are using dating apps, you're doing it wrong.

• View post

  > I can see the appeal of eschewing society as a whole in favor of a bot that I know won’t ask me my political or religious leanings and then tailor their behavior around my answer. ... tailoring their behavior around your answer is *literally how LLMs work*. That's why they're so sycophantic. Also unless you're running it locally on a machine you control, it doesn't need to ask you about your political or religious leanings anyway *because it already knows*. That's exact...

• View post

  That's not athleticism, that's a different sport. I can beat marathon runners too when I use a bicycle.

• View post

  Even if you were somehow able to overcome the "can" question, the far more meaningful question is "will it do so fairly", and it's absolutely certain it will not. If you agree the problem of the justice system is that rich people own it, this is not the solution to that problem. This *literally is* that problem.